Sparkling watermelon drink ENJOY, 1.5 l

Sparkling watermelon drink ENJOY, 1.5 l

1,5 l
E 22 Very poor Lowers the score: Sugars Lowers the score: Energy
36 kcal · 100 ml · 1 glass (250 ml) ≈ 90 kcal

Healthier picks of the same kind

Sparkling drink ENJOY, watermelon flavor, 1.5 l 18 kcal · 100 g 50% fewer kcal less sugar Compare → C 56
All: Sparkling watermelon
100 ml and 1,5 l
36kcal
153 kJ/ 36 kcal
Whole pack (1,5 l)
540 kcal
Fat
0 g
0% of energy
Carbohydrates
9 g
100% of energy
Proteins
0 g
0% of energy
Nutrition per 100 ml and per 1,5 l pack
Nutrient 100 ml 1,5 l
Energy 153 kJ/ 36 kcal
540 kcal
27% RI
Fat 0 g
0 g
0% RI
of which saturates 0 g
0 g
0% RI
Carbohydrate 9 g
135 g
52% RI
of which sugars 9 g
135 g
150% RI
Protein 0 g
0 g
0% RI
Salt 0 g
0 g
0% RI

RI – reference intake for an adult (2000 kcal).

From the product label · updated 2026-10

E 22
Very poor
22 out of 100 · Judged as: drink
Lowers the score
  • Sugars −7
  • Energy −3
How this is worked out

We use the Nutri-Score method: points for energy, sugar, saturated fat and salt, less points for protein, fibre and fruit and vegetable content. Drinks, oils and cheese are judged on their own scales — otherwise olive oil would look worse than a sugary drink purely for being calorie-dense.

Shops do not publish fibre, so we treat it as zero. Whole grain and pulse products may therefore score slightly lower here than the label on the packet says.

0.0 g
Protein / 100 kcal
100%
Sugar of carbs
How many calories are in Sparkling watermelon drink ENJOY, 1.5 l?
100 g – 36 kcal. 1 glass (250 ml) ≈ 90 kcal. 1 pack (1,5 l) ≈ 540 kcal.
How much protein, fat and carbohydrate?
Per 100 g: protein 0 g, fat 0 g, carbohydrate 9 g.
Is Sparkling watermelon drink ENJOY, 1.5 l a healthy choice?
Health grade E (22 of 100), from its sugar, saturated fat, salt, fibre and protein.

Added by a community member · 2026-09-02

Show all (4) Every store’s version of the same product

Label facts, in your feed every day

Where the sugar hides, which has the most protein, which yogurt is better – short comparisons worth saving.